How can I set the deployment target to OS X 10. It seems that while building Boost it sets the deployment target to OS X 10.12. Cross-compilation process is covered as well. following this guide you will be able to build as x8664 (aka for Intel chip based Mac) so as arm64 (aka for Apple Silicon based Mac) binaries. ![]() ![]() The value of this variable should be set prior to the first project () or enable. This guide covers qBittorrent compilation process for any supported Mac systems as of writing, i.e. See that target property for additional information. This variable is used to initialize the OSXARCHITECTURES property on each target as it is created. See documentation of the EXPORTNAME target property to change the name of the exported target. To actually install the export file itself, call install (EXPORT), documented below. It must appear before any target options. I have XCode 8 installed on this machine. Target specific architectures for macOS and iOS. This option associates the installed target files with an export called .Ld: warning: object file (/Users/pritam/opt/boost_1_62_0/stage/lib/libboost_regex.a(static_mutex.o)) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.11) Ld: warning: object file (/Users/pritam/opt/boost_1_62_0/stage/lib/libboost_regex.a(cpp_regex_traits.o)) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.11) Ld: warning: object file (/Users/pritam/opt/boost_1_62_0/stage/lib/libboost_regex.a(regex_raw_buffer.o)) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.11) Ld: warning: object file (/Users/pritam/opt/boost_1_62_0/stage/lib/libboost_regex.a(regex_traits_defaults.o)) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.11) Ld: warning: object file (/Users/pritam/opt/boost_1_62_0/stage/lib/libboost_regex.a(regex.o)) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.11) When I make the program I get following warnings: ld: warning: object file (/Users/pritam/opt/boost_1_62_0/stage/lib/libboost_regex.a(instances.o)) was built for newer OSX version (10.12) than being linked (10.11) Set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++")įind_package(Boost 1.62.0 COMPONENTS regex) ![]() Std::cout << boost::regex_replace(s, expr, fmt) << '\n' Īnd tried to build it with the following CMake file cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8.9) I also have a testing branch set up to check CMAKEOSXDEPLOYMENTTARGET and the compiler command in the CI builds: GitHub CI builds MacOS 10.15 (without the new library, with CMAKEOSXDEPLOYMENTTARGET) and 11 (with the new library, with CMAKEOSXDEPLOYMENTTARGET), and Circle CI builds MacOS 12 (with the new library, but without CMAKEOSX. Then I created a simple C++ program : #include Extracted it and built is as per the docs here: īasically, I went to the directory and ran the "bootstrap.sh" and "b2" scripts. I downloaded the 1.62 version of Boost from official SourceForge repository. ![]() ĬMakeLists.I am trying to use Boost CPP library on Mac OS X 10.11.6. Just tried this on my 10.6 install, and I was getting a linker error when trying to compile for 10.5 - turns out you also need to specify the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET environment variable!Īnyway, here's what I'm doing when running on Mountain Lion (OSX 10.8) to compile for 10.7:Ĭommand line: MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7Ĭmake -G "Unix Makefiles" -DCMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.7.sdk/ -DCMAKE_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.7. Note: CArchDaemonUnix is a class in Synergy (an open source project I'm working on). Ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386Ĭlang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) However, I now see this error when I compile against 10.7 (which I don't see with 10.8): Undefined symbols for architecture i386:ĮxecSelfNonDaemonized() in libarch.a(CArchDaemonUnix.o)ĬArchDaemonUnix::daemonize(char const*, int (*)(int, char const**)) in libarch.a(CArchDaemonUnix.o) After trying sakra's valid answer (valid as far as CMake is suposed to behave) unsucessfully, I had a dig around and found that if I specify the -sysroot flag to the compiler, it seems to use the correct SDK!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |